Electoral Act 84 (12): Court of Appeal restrains Malami – Nexus News
The Court of Appeal has stopped the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Abubakar Malami (SAN) and others from frustrating the hearing of an appeal against a judgment directing the AGF to delete Section 84 (12) from the Electoral Act 2022.
A three-member panel, chaired by Justice Rita Nosakhare Pemu, in a ruling, gave the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) permission to appeal, as an interested party, against the March 18, 2022 judgment by Justice Justice Evelyn Anyadike of the Federal High Court in Umuahia.
The Appeal Court made the directive in a ruling issued at the Owerri Division on April 7, a copy of which was sighted by Newsmen yesterday.
The court also granted an accelerated hearing in the appeal.
The ruling was on a motion marked: CA/OW/87m/2022 pressed by the PDP, with Chief Nduka Edede (plaintiff in the suit decided by Justice Anyadike) and the AGF as respondents.
It reads: “Leave is hereby granted the applicant (PDP) to appeal as person interested in this appeal – CA/OW/87/2022.
“Due to the exigencies of this appeal and its constitutional colourization, there is need to hear this matter expeditiously.
“Accordingly, the appellant is hereby given up to Tuesday 12th of April, 2022 to file its notice of appeal and the parties are to file their respective briefs of arguments within three days from the date of service of the notice and record of appeal on the respondents.
“There shall be a further three days given to the appellant to file a reply.
“Parties should desist from taking any step to frustrate the hearing of the appeal.
“The matter is adjourned to the 4th of May, 2022, for the hearing of the appeal.
“Fresh hearing notice to be issued on the 2nd to the 12th respondents.”
The National Assembly has also revealed its intention to formally appeal the judgment by Justice Anyadike.
Justice Anyadike had in the March 18 judgment in the lawsuit by Edede marked: FHC/UM/CS/26/2022, held that Section 18(12) of the reviewed Electoral Act as unconstitutional and should be voided.
The judge stated that sections 66(1)(f), 107(1)(f), 137(1)(f) and 182(1)(f) of the 1999 Constitution already stipulated that government appointees seeking to contest elections are only to resign at least 30 days before the election.
Read Also: Nnamdi Kanu will be acquitted in May – Bishop
She maintained that any other law that orders such appointees to resign or leave the office at any time before the 30 days provided in the Constitution was unconstitutional and annulled to the extent of its inconsistency with the clear provisions of the Constitution.
Justice Anyadike then directed the AGF to remove the said Section 18(12) from the reviewed Electoral Act.
Section 84(12) of the Electoral Act provides: “No political appointee at any level shall be a voting delegate or be voted for at the convention or congress of any political party for the purpose of the nomination of candidates for any election.”
The PDP has already filed another suit before the Federal High Court in Abuja in which it is questioning among others, President Muhammadu Buhari’s request that the National Assembly should amend the provision of Section 84(12) of the Electoral Act.
The case marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/247/2022, before Justice Inyang Ekwo, has been postponed till April 28 for hearing.
Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, who at the weekend announced his interest in the presidential race, may be affected by the Electoral Act provision.
Going by Section 84 (12), he is mandated to resign to participate in his party’s primary, being a political appointee.
Minister of Labour, Chief Chris Ngige, who had revealed that he may contest, will also be expected to resign should he eventually declare his intentions.
About Author
